Consent
Consent, in data protection, is a freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous indication by which an individual agrees to the processing of their personal data for a defined purpose.
How Consent works
Under the GDPR, consent is one of six lawful bases for processing and carries strict conditions. It must be freely given (not bundled or coerced), specific to defined purposes, informed (the individual must understand what they are agreeing to and by whom), and unambiguous, expressed through a clear affirmative action. Pre-ticked boxes, silence, or inactivity do not qualify.
Valid consent must be as easy to withdraw as it was to give, and organizations must be able to demonstrate that they obtained it. Where processing concerns special categories of data, the standard rises to explicit consent. These requirements are why compliant consent banners record granular choices and store a verifiable record of each decision.
The ePrivacy Directive adds a separate consent requirement for storing or accessing information on a user's device, such as cookies, local storage, or other client-side identifiers, unless that access is strictly necessary to provide a service the user explicitly requested. This is why many analytics and tracking scripts are gated behind consent even when a business might otherwise rely on legitimate interests for the downstream processing.
In practice, organizations often combine mechanisms: consent for non-essential tracking and advertising, and other lawful bases such as legitimate interests or contractual necessity for functions like security and fraud prevention. Deciding which basis applies to a given activity is a legal judgment that depends on purpose, necessity, and user expectations.
Why Consent matters for fraud prevention
Consent sits at the intersection of fraud prevention and privacy because the two can pull in different directions. Security functions frequently need to run reliably for every visitor, including attackers who would simply decline consent, which is why many operators rely on legitimate interests rather than consent for strictly protective purposes. At the same time, any client-side access and any non-essential processing may require valid consent. Understanding where consent is required, and where another lawful basis is more appropriate, is essential to running fraud detection that is both effective and lawful.
How TRACIO handles it
TRACIO gives customers the flexibility to fit device intelligence into their own consent architecture. Because TRACIO is oriented toward security and fraud prevention, many customers assess strictly necessary or legitimate-interests bases for that specific purpose, while gating any broader or non-essential use behind consent. TRACIO does not decide this for the customer or assert that consent is unnecessary. Determining when consent is required, capturing it, and honoring withdrawals remains the customer's responsibility, and TRACIO is designed to operate within whatever consent framework the customer implements.
Related terms
Frequently asked questions
Identify every device with confidence
Start with a free plan of 2,500 API calls per month. No credit card required.